Monday, January 26, 2015

Malam Minggu Miko (Raditya Dika)

Akhir2 ini gw sering nontonin cuplikan2 film malam Minggu Miko d Youtube.. Ternyata benar2 memberi inspirasi... Hehehe.... Gw pgn puny/dpt cewe yg semacam anak kampus kota besar, semacam Disty n Belinda. Pgn hidup asik seperti anak2 kota besar. Pgn gampang dkt m cew, n gampang dapetin cew... Pgn dolan m cew dg love, hug, n kiss... (gw tahu batas kok dlm berpacaran).. Tp yaah, sudahlah.... semoga waktu suwung gw makin sedikit, n gw dpt kerjaan yg ok, yg asik, kerjaan dikit, gaji tetap n banyak (min 4x UMR), DNTY amin.

*may be this is my wish 4 my Birthday* hahahaa... ^^#~

WASPADALAH terhadap Injil++ yg berkedok "Makanan Keras Hanya Untuk yg (ingin) Dewasa Rohani"


WASPADALAH terhadap Injil++ yg berkedok "Makanan Keras Hanya Untuk yg (ingin) Dewasa Rohani"


Shalom, sdh lm kt mngetahui akn adny mcm2 ajaran2 "Kristen" yg anh2, sprti minyak-anggur, tumen, bnda2 profetis, jarah menjarah, yahudi, asal bukan Allah, theologi kemakmuran, dll.
D sni sy hndak memaparkan bbrpa ajaran yg keliru nmun brsmbunyi d blik ungkpan "Mknan Keras hny utk yg (ingin) dewasa rohani"
Ok, prtma2 kt bhas bhw Injil adlh kbr gembira, bhwa Allah mnylmatkn manusia. Ketika ssorg mnerima Tuhan Yesus Kristus sbg Tuhan dan juruslamtny, mk org tsb sdh brpindah dr maut kpd hdp yg kekal, dr kegelapan kpd kerajaan Allah dan terang-Nya yg ajaib.
Namun syngny stlah itu bnyk pdt2/hmba2 Tuhan yg mletkkan kuk2 yg aneh2 pd jemaat/org2 Kristen dg alsan agr mrk mkin brtmbuh mjd dwsa rohani. Utk dwsa mk mrka prlu dberi "Makanan Keras".
Scr afektif & psikologis, sp sh yg tdk ingin mjd dwsa, & merasa bangga apbla bs mlakukan ssuatu yg lain/lbh drpd umumnya. Tntu jemaat akn mrsa bangga bila mrka mrsa dan diktakan Dewasa Rohani. Msalahnya definisi Dwsa rohani ini Srg Tdk Jls.

dlm bbrp forum debat sy mnemukn ad bbrp ajaran Injil++ yg brkdok Mknan Krs bg yg Dwsa Rohani:

1 EENS (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus)
Ajrn ini mnytkan bhw di luar Grj Katolik Roma tdk ad kslmatan.

"Gereja Roma yang Terkudus benar-benar mempercayai, meyakini dan menyatakan bahwa mereka yang tidak hidup dalam Gereja Katolik, tidak hanya Kafir, tapi juga penganut Yudaisme, skismatik, dan bidat tidak bisa menjadi participant dalam kehidupan kekal, tapi akan pergi 'ke dalam api yang kekal yang telah sedia untuk Iblis dan malaikat-malaikatnya' (Mat 25:41), kecuali sebelum akhir hidupnya mereka ditambahkan ke kumpulan domba; dan kesatuan dari tubuh Gereja begitu kuatnya sehingga hanya kepada mereka yang berada didalam kesatuan tersebut sakramen Gereja berdaya untuk keselamatan. Dan [hanya didalam Gerejalah] puasa, kemurahan dan fungsi kebaikan Kristen lain bisa memberikan hadiah, dan bahwa tidak seorangpun, apapun kemurahan yang dia lakukan, bahkan bila dia telah menumpahkan darah untuk nama Kristus, bisa diselamatkan, kecuali dia berada didalam pelukan dan kesatuan dari Gereja Katolik."
-Pope Eugene IV and the Ecumenical Council of Florence (A.D. 1438 - 1445)-

"Kami menyatakan, kami mewartakan, dan kami menegaskan bahwa Adalah SANGAT PERLU bagi semua orang untuk KESELAMATAN mereka, TUNDUK kepada Paus Roma.
-(Unam Sanctam, Bull Pp. Bonifacius VIII)-

Jelas ini Injil++ yaitu Injil+mjd anggota Gereja Katolik di bawah Paus Roma

2 Ajaran2 semi Yahudi.
Saat dibaptis org Kristen br dianggap sbg bayi rohani, & mrka prlu ddewaskn shg mjd dwsa rohani, mslahny mrka ini salah kaprah dg mngartikn Mkin Dewasa Rohani = Mkin Yahudi.
Maka mrka pun mkin bnyk mmakai budya Yahudi sbg tnda bhw mrka mkin dwsa Rohani,
Walopun di antra mrka sndri ad prbdaan & sring ad prdebatan, namun sbgian bsar ciri/corak ajaranny adlah sbg berikut di antarany:
hr Minggu vs Sabtu, nm Allah vs YHWH, Cm mkn binatang kosher Im 11, hr ry Kristen vs Hr Ry Yahudi Im 23 (Messianic), & bbrapa di antarany ad yg merunut silsilah/suksesi apostolik Yahudi dr Mar David,penerus dr Yaqub HaTzadik (Nasrani Intrnsional). Mrk mngatakn bhwa mrka adlah grj mula2, pemilik prjanjian dg Alaha, dg kitab Limudah/Didache bg Goyim, & mengakui Injil Thomas.

Jelas ini jg Injil++ yaitu Injil+Tradisi Yahudi

3 Ini yg brbhaya, pngjaran yg mngaku Suara Kbnaran, Frman Tuhan Yg Murni, nmun trnyta tdk murni, namun Injil++
Akhir2 ini d slah 1 grup dbat rohani d fb sdg ad suatu ksnangan/kbanggaan yg aneh klo bs mnjalani hal2 yg tdk enk, penjelasanny seolah2 mmaparkn/mgulas Alkitab, nmun pd akhirny mlah mnmbahi Injil itu sndri. Bnyk jg pngikutny, mrka mrsa bngga klo bs mngushkan/brusha utk "Lbih Dwsa Rohani" dg brusha utk mnjlankn "Kehendak Bapa" spy "Bapa berkenan" ato mndpt "Perkenanan Bapa" agr msuk sorga. Mrka brusha utk mnjdi sprti Yesus biar Bapa Brknan & mrka msuk sorga. Tntu sj hal ini Grace tdk mjd Grace lg, melainkn mjd Grace++ ato Grace + work 4 salvation.
Ciri ajran ini adlh Brusha utk HDP SMPURNA SPRTI YESUS agr mndpt PERKENANAN BAPA.
INI BAHAYA. LBH BRBAHYA DRPD TEOLOGI KMAKMURAN, krn Teologi Kmakmuran pling hny mmbuat org mjd "childish" scra rohani, tp ajaran ini bs mnybabkn org jtuh pd KESOMBONGAN, PERSAINGAN, & USAHA DIRI SENDIRI utk brlomba2 "mmenuhi Khendak Bapa". Jemaat/org prcya bs mjd trdrong utk mngusahkan works despite brsndar pnuh pd Grace itu sndiri. Tntu saja dalih/kedoknya adlh "Makanan Keras utk Dewasa Rohani". Spa sh org Kristen yg mau dktain knak2 rohani? Tntu sj org2 Kristen akn mrsa BANGGA bila mrsa & diakui dwsa rohani. Bgmna biar dktakn Dwsa rohani?: hdup dg usaha sndri utk "mlaksnakn khndak Bapa", knpa sy blg usha sndri? krn mrka kurg mneknkan mujizat ajaib, lbih mneknkan usaha mnusia scr "normal" & "rasional" utk mnaati "khndak Bapa". Hal2 ajaib kurg dprhtikn, lbih mnganalisa Firman Tuhan dg setting rohani/jiwani/ideologi falsafah, lbih k mslah rohani/jiwani/teologis/ide/ideologis/falsafah hidup/cra2 utk mlksnakan khndak Tuhan dlm khidupn -normal- shri2. Kurg mmbri prhatian pd hal2 kenyataan yg ajaib/mujizat.

Jelas ini jg Injil++ yaitu Injil+Brusha mlakukn khndak Bapa shg mjd SEMPURNA sm sprti YESUS, biar Bapa brknan, & msuk sorga.

Mari kt dgrkn ap kt Firman Tuhan yg MURNI

Roma 5:8-11
8 Akan tetapi Allah menunjukkan kasih-Nya kepada kita, oleh karena Kristus telah mati untuk kita, ketika kita masih berdosa.
9 Lebih-lebih, karena kita sekarang telah dibenarkan oleh darah-Nya, kita pasti akan diselamatkan dari murka Allah.
10 Sebab jikalau kita, ketika masih seteru, diperdamaikan dengan Allah oleh kematian Anak-Nya, lebih-lebih kita, yang sekarang telah diperdamaikan, pasti akan diselamatkan oleh hidup-Nya!
11 Dan bukan hanya itu saja! Kita malah bermegah dalam Allah oleh Yesus Kristus, Tuhan kita, sebab oleh Dia kita telah menerima pendamaian itu.

Amen.


Waspadalah terhadap penyimpangan Injil yg menyiratkan/m engisyaratkan:

Hidup Enak (terima mujizat, kesembuhan, theologi sukses, pertolongan ajaib yg enak, dll) = Kanak2 Rohani.

 

Hidup Gak Enak (sangkal diri pikul salib, ditibani banyak masalah keluarga, keuangan, sakit penyakit, tetap bertahan, dll, Firman Tuhan dianalisis hany dg tujuan supaya bs melaksanakan dan menyenangkan dan mendapat perkenan Bapa , mengesampingkan aspek supranatural dr Firman Tuhan) , Merasa kalo menderita, menahan diri, mbatek ati, mbatek pikiran, nahan drive n keinginan, berarti menyenangkan/menaati perintah/menuruti/melaksanakan "kehendak Bapa" = Dewasa Rohani.
 

Ini Bahaya, ini penyimpangan.

Secara psikologis tidak sehat...

bisa jatuh dlm masokisme dan KESOMBONGAN ROHANI DG SOK BERUSAHA MELAKSANAKAN KEHENDAK BAPA.

Kalo zaman era Katolik dulu (sampe sekarang bbrp masih ad) Menjelang Paskah ad org yg nyambuk2 dirinya sendiri sampe berdarah2 sbg silih, sdgkn zaman sekarang kalo menurut aliran ini org akan MERASA TELAH MENJALANKAN KEHENDAK BAPA dg pikul salib (menahan drive, dll), shg LUPA AKAN KEENAKAN / KEASYIKAN / KESENANGAN MENGIKUT TUHAN (Buku catatan hal 52, hwkwhwk...) Shg bs mjd CELAH IBLIS saat ingat TUHAN ingate TUAN/MASTER YG KEJAM DAN MENEKAN (celah iblis utk memainkan stimulus-respon /ASOSIASI). PADAHAL YESUS MENGAJARKAN BAHWA TUHAN ITU BAIK.

ATAU KALO ENGGAK DIA AKAN MERASA SOMBONG DAN BANGGA SAAT MERASA SUDAH MELAKSANAKAN KEHENDAK BAPA DG TIDAK MENERIMA HAL2 YG ENAK, N MEMANDANG RENDAH SODARA2 SEIMAN YG MENERIMA HAL2 YG ENAK (Mujizat, kesembuhan, ad org ngasih uang, kejadian2 ajaib, minyak-anggur, dll) DENGAN MERASA LEBIH DEWASA ROHANI DRPD MEREKA (SODARA2 SEIMAN) YG DIIZINKAN TUHAN MENGALAMI HAL2 YG ENAK DR TUHAN.

MERASA DIRI LEBIH DEWASA ROHANI HANYA KARENA SUKA KHOTBAH2 MAKANAN KERAS (ANTI YG ENAK2)
dan MERASA LEBIH SPIRITUAL GIANT / RAKSASA ROHANI hanya karena SERING MENDAPAT HAL2 YG TIDAK ENAK NAMUN TETAP KUAT (tidak dikasih mujizat ajaib, semua NORMAL2 saja, Hidup hanya FOKUS utk MELAKSANAKAN MELAKSANAKAN agar DIPERKENAN agar DIPERKENAN, SHG LUPA MENIKMATI, LUPA BAGAIMANA CARANY AGAR DAPAT MUJIZAT PENGALAMAN AJAIB DR TUHAN)

WASPADALAH... waspadalah...!!!!

Just post Article Ilmiah Psychology, no nethink.

Just Artikel ilmiah, dont negative thinking...
Biar blog gw ky ad isiny gituh... wkwkwk.....

An old joke tells of four women who interview for a job with a male boss. The choice is difficult because all four are clearly qualified. So who gets the job? The one with the largest breasts.
Men typically smile at the punch line, but women often cringe, feeling tyrannized by breast size the way many men feel oppressed by the size of something else—except that penises are usually hidden, while women’s chests are routinely visible and often accentuated by clothing.
Personally, I’ve never understood men’s supposed preference for big boobs. In my relationships, the women’s breasts have ranged from small to large, and I’ve never cared. When I got involved with women who were smart, kind, and fun, who could put up with me, and who were willing to remove their bras, I felt so grateful that I thoroughly enjoyed whatever fell out of them.

The Conventional Wisdom: Men Prefer Large Breasts

But apparently, I’m in the minority. Two recent studies support the notion that men prefer big boobs:
• French researchers fitted women with various size padded bras and then sent them to cafés where they sat alone. As bra size increased, so did the number of men who approached them.
• New Zealand researchers used eye-tracking technology to assess how men viewed women with various-size breasts. While small boobs attracted and held some men’s attention, most men gazed at the women with medium to large breasts. (Many women complain that men talk to their breasts, not to their faces.)
The bra industry supports the idea that bigger is better. The first modern bra was patented in 1914—two handkerchiefs sewn together with straps made of ribbon. Soon after, padded bras appeared to make breasts look bigger. In 1948, Frederick Mellinger, founder of Frederick's of Hollywood, introduced the push-up bra, which made them look even larger. And in 1994 the Wonderbra became a sensation. A refinement of the push-up concept that accented cleavage, Wonderbra tripled sales of push-up bras from less than 3 percent of the market to 10 percent.
Finally, since 1990, the average American bra size has increased from 34B to 36C. Ditto for England. One reason is breast augmentation. Surgeons now perform 317,000 boob jobs annually (vs. around 100,000 reductions).

Plenty of Men Love Small Breasts

But beyond augmentations, another reason explains more of the recent increase in average bra size—weight gain. Breasts are fatty. As weight increases, so does breast size, and with one-third of American adults now considered overweight, many women’s breasts have grown heftier.
Meanwhile, flat-chested models dominate the fashion runways of Paris, Milan, and New York. And because top models often wed celebrities or alpha-males, some of the world’s richest, most visible women have small breasts.
I googled “women’s breast size men’s preference,” and found several discussions. Participants were self-selected and not representative, but the comments were all over the map. Some said they could feel attracted only to women with a specific endowment. (The leading preference was large, followed by medium then small.) But like me, many men insisted that when they fell in love, they fell in love with the women’s breasts, whatever their size.
This dovetails with the visual evidence displayed in that major window into men’s erotic desires, pornography. Back in the days before the Internet, all the girls in Playboy had huge breasts because that’s what the magazine’s publisher, Hugh Hefner, likes. But visit any of the zillion free porn-sampler sites (lobstertube.com, cliti.com, etc.) and you can view men erotically enraptured by women of every imaginable size from utterly flat to zeppelins.
Finally, English and Malaysian researchers showed full-body photos of women to 361 men, who rated their attractiveness. The women with large breasts were not considered the most attractive. The honor when to the women with medium-size endowments.

Breast Size and Evolutionary Psychology

Paleolithic cave art dating back 35,000 years portrays naked women with enormous hips and breasts. Perhaps that’s pre-historic porn, or maybe it has to do with reproductive fitness. Just as any size penis can cause a pregnancy, all breasts can swell with milk and nurture infants. But evolution seems to have primed men to believe that women with larger breasts are a better reproductive bet.
Long before the contemporary obesity epidemic, when food was scarce and starvation a real threat, large, fatty breasts suggested caloric reserves. That, in turn, suggested that the women had reliable access to food, which increased survival odds for their offspring—and for their impregnators. English and Malaysian researchers showed photographs of women with varying breast size to 266 Malaysian men whose socioeconomic status ranged from poor to wealthy. Poor men showed a significantly greater preference for large breasts than middle-class men, who in turn were more likely to prefer larger breasts than the wealthy men who had plenty of resources and didn’t “need” women with substantial fat reserves. (This may explain why the wealthiest men often fall for skinny models.)
Then the researchers showed the photos to 66 Englishmen who were hungry and 58 others who’d just eaten. Compared with the satiated men, those who felt hungry rated larger breasts significantly more attractive. Taken together, these studies suggest that resource security plays a role in men’s breast size preferences.

Breast Size and Sexism

Some evidence also suggests that oppressive attitudes toward women may play a role in men’s size preference. Recall the 361 Englishmen who considered women with medium-size breasts the most attractive. The researchers also asked them to complete a survey that explored their feelings about women in society. The most sexist showed a strong preference for large breasts, while the more egalitarian men preferred smaller breasts.
So do men really want women with big boobs? Some do, at least in fantasy, hence the joke about the woman who gets the job. But many prefer women with medium or small breasts, and many others don’t care. It turns out that men’s feelings about women’s breasts are more complex than the stereotype would have us believe.



References:
Dixson, B.J. et al. “Eye Tracking of Men’s Preferences for Female Breast Size and Areola Pigmentation,” Archives of Sexual Behavior (2011) 40:51.
Gueguen, N. “Women’s Bust Size and Men’s Courtship Solicitation,” Body Image (2007) 4:386.
Swami, V. and M.J. Tovee. “Resource Security Impacts Men’s Female Breast Size Preferences,” PloS One. (2013) 8:e57623.
Swami, V. and M.J. Tovee. “Men’s Oppressive Beliefs Predict Their Breast Size Preferences in Women,” Archives of Sexual Behavior (2013) Feb. epub ahead of print.

Source:  https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/201306/boobs-mens-complex-feelings-about-womens-breasts